Calling them “savages” feels wrong—weren’t they just fighting for their own survival too?
The Beast was the real savage here, not the tribe.
Without Beauty, Kong would’ve probably lost—she was the brains of the duo.
Are we glorifying violence, or just rewriting history to look cool?
The so-called “savages” actually look more organized than the main characters.
If this was real, humans wouldn’t have lasted a day against natives like that.
Beauty wasn’t brave, she was reckless—putting both herself and Kong in danger.
This story makes it seem like outsiders are always the “heroes,” which feels biased.
The natives were defending their land—so who’s truly the villain here?
Honestly, Kong surviving all of this feels way too unrealistic—it’s fantasy, not history.